How to Submit Your SaaS to Made with React.js (2026 Guide)

Made with React.js is a showcase for React-built sites and apps. It is a technology-specific gallery, so the audience is developers judging implementation.

The short answer

The only question that matters with Made with React.js is whether the category page it publishes you into has search visibility of its own. If it does, the listing inherits it; if it does not, you have bought a card.

What Made with React.js is

A gallery of sites and applications built with React, with submissions reviewed before publication. Start from madewithreactjs.com, where the submission form lives.

What it is good for

Community audiences are small, opinionated and technical. They will tell you what is wrong with the product, which is worth more than a citation.

Before you touch the form

Run the audit the reviewers will run: performance, console errors, one keyboard pass. React showcases are read by developers, and a slow first paint is the review.

Submitting, in order

Check Lighthouse before submitting
Fix obvious accessibility issues
Prepare a full-page screenshot
Submit the live URL
Wait for review

One thing that catches people out

The live site is the submission. Performance, accessibility and clean interaction matter more here than any description you write.

Checking what you actually got

Confirm the page is live within a week of submitting
Inspect the anchor: direct link or redirect
Note the referring domain’s DR in the same row
Re-check indexation at one month and again at three
Delete dead listings from the count instead of leaving them in

Where it fits in a launch plan

Sequence matters less here than recording. Whichever order you submit in, the value appears in the audit six weeks later, when you can see which catalogues were worth the time.

The live site is the application

Technology galleries are the only directories where the submission is judged by using the product rather than reading about it. That changes the preparation entirely: the copy is secondary, and the site is the artefact.

Run the site on a mid-range phone before submitting. If the first interaction stutters, the review is over regardless of how good the description is.

What developers check first

Three things, in order: how long until something usable appears, whether the console is clean, and whether the interface behaves like a native app or like a page pretending to be one.

None of these appear in your submission form and all of them appear in the reviewer's first ninety seconds. Fix them before submitting, not after a rejection.

Performance is the copy

In a React showcase, load time is a statement about competence. A 4-second first paint says the team did not profile; a 1.2-second one says they did.

The common wins are boring and effective: route-level code splitting, compressed images with explicit dimensions, and removing a font or a library nobody uses. An afternoon of work, measurable in a single number you can put in the submission.

A ten-minute accessibility pass

Keyboard navigation through the main flow, readable contrast on buttons, labels on inputs, and alt text on the one image that carries meaning. That is enough to avoid an obvious defect.

It is not a compliance audit and it does not need to be. It is the difference between a site that works for the reviewer and one that fails on the first tab press.

The screenshot they actually want

Full page, no device frame, no marketing overlay. A gallery card is a thumbnail of the product, and a decorative mock-up reads as a landing page rather than an application.

If the product has a signature screen, submit that one at a viewport width where it does not look cramped. The card is small; a dense dashboard shrinks into noise.

What this audience gives you that a directory cannot

Developers in a technology gallery will tell you what is slow, what is broken and what is unnecessary, publicly and without tact. That feedback is worth more than the citation, and it is the reason this kind of gallery is worth a submission even on a domain with modest authority.

FAQ

Do I need to open-source the code?

No — the gallery links to the live site. A repository helps, but it is not the entry requirement.

Where SaasHunt fits

Worth pairing with a platform that publishes on a schedule rather than a queue. SaasHunt launches at 08:00 UTC, ranks daily and weekly, and gives every approved listing a dofollow link; tiers start at $0 and run through $9.9, $12.9, $49 and $50 — the pricing page explains what each adds.

Submit your product